Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1571

reference
935-tree-1
name
1571
tree-preservation-order

undefined

935-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027700 50.876028)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027658 50.876024,-1.027660 50.876032,-1.027665 50.876040,-1.027675 50.876046,-1.027687 50.876050,-1.027700 50.876051,-1.027713 50.876050,-1.027725 50.876046,-1.027734 50.876040,-1.027741 50.876033,-1.027743 50.876024,-1.027741 50.876016,-1.027735 50.876008,-1.027726 50.876002,-1.027714 50.875998,-1.027701 50.875997,-1.027688 50.875998,-1.027676 50.876002,-1.027666 50.876008,-1.027660 50.876015,-1.027658 50.876024)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL